I believe the answer is B
Answer:
The author supports the claim that it was a "hard fight" to win their right to vote because they weren't considered equal workers to the men workers.
Explanation:
It was considered that women's duties were to take care of the household and to raise children, so they did not have the right to vote and to hold political office. However, women also knew who would be the best choice for society, so they needed the right to vote because they also had good judgment about society and politic situation.
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Answer:
Not well
Explanation:
For years, the Democratic-Republicans had given the Federalists grief over the actions of the Federal government. Once they were in power, the Democratic-Republicans essentially did the same as what the Federalists did as evidenced with actions like that of the Louisiana Purchase.