Answer:
Dr Seller Account $100
Cr Buyer Account $100
Explanation:
The property sold on 15th of the month by Mr. A to Mr. B and the utility bill received later of this month would be split between Mr. A and Mr. B. The basis for the split of the utility bills would be the share that Mr. A utilized the facilities and in this scenario, it is $100. Hence the buyer Mr. B has receivable of $100 and the seller Mr. A has a liability payable of $100 amount.
Hence the buyer will debit the bill by $100 receivable and the Seller will debit the bill owed to buyer by $100.
Answer:
DR Cash ..............................................................$ 176,000
CR Sales Revenue................................................................$149,600
CR Deferred Revenue..........................................................$26,400
Explanation:
Revenue should only be recorded when earned and as the 6 month technical support can be sold separately, it is revenue that has not be earned yet as the 6 months have not elapsed. This will therefore need to be recorded as Deferred revenue.
Sold alone, the revenue is more than when they are sold together so use the standalone price to find out the revenue when sold together by proportionality.
Sales revenue = 153,000/180,000 * 176,000
= $149,600
Deferred Revenue = 27,000/180,000 * 176,000
= $26,400
In San Francisco, there are many restaurants that specialize in a wide variety of cuisines. Patronage at these restaurants is influenced by factors such as tastes, price, and location. This market is option (b) i.e, monopolistically competitive.
<h3>
What is monopolistically competitive?</h3>
An industry with a lot of companies offering similar (but not identical) replacement goods or services is known as one with monopolistic competition. In a monopolistic competitive industry, there are few barriers to entry and exit, and no firm's decisions directly affect those of its rivals.
Monopolistic competition is characterized by a number of features.
- slight variations in the goods and services,
- Free access to the market and exit
- many businesses
- Profits from incomplete consumer knowledge
Consumer electronics, apparel, restaurants, and hair salons are a few examples of industries with monopolistic competition. Each business delivers goods that are comparable to those of other businesses in the same sector. They can, however, set themselves out through branding and marketing.
To know more about monopolistic competition refer to: brainly.com/question/13686157
#SPJ4
Answer:
Follows are the solution to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
It must allocate 
for both the taxicab and 
for the rest of the license, the client list, and the company name registered.
Its cost of intangible material could be amortized for 180 months starting in April. 
is her amortization deduction.
She could also use Section 179 to decrease her taxable money to 
but include her deduction.
Her taxable annual income is 
.
In point b:
They must allocate 
for the taxi and for their licenses, the customer list as well as the business by interacting with people register. Its cost of the material could be depreciated for 180 months, starting in April.
is her amortization deduction.
The taxable income here 
Section 179 could be requested if another income is earned on the tax return (such as W-2 wages).
As all Section 179 is unpaid with other earned income, it is carried forward into the next year.
Answer:
Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the term used to define the ability of an individual, firm or country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than that if it’s competitors or trade partners. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from the second best alternative.
When a country can produce a product more efficiently (i.e maximum output using minimum resources) than that of its trade partners, it is known as that it has absolute advantage in that product. India tends to have absolute advantage in both business processes outsourcing as well as producing agricultural commodities as it is mentioned that it can produce both of these more efficiently than the United States.
However, although it has absolute advantage in both, it is still less efficient in producing agricultural commodities when compared to business process outsourcing. In other words, if it attempts to produce agricultural commodities in-house, the benefit lost from the second best alternative: business process outsourcing is high. The opportunity cost is higher when it produces agricultural commodities than it is when it does business process outsourcing. Hence, due to the law of comparative advantage, it chooses to specialize in business process outsourcing and imports agricultural commodities.
