Sorry about the hand writing um just write what's in the box
Answer:
A revisionist view of Bartolome de las Casas as the ‘author’ of the introduction of African slaves to the Indies/Americas in the early 16th century. The article details Las Casas’ thinking and actions and concludes that while Las Casas did—among other contemporaries—suggest the importation of African slaves to lift the burden of oppression off the Amerindians, his perspective and view was altered radically in the last third of his life. The article explores the meaning of African slavery in the context of the place and time where Las Casas grew up—Andalucía in southern Spain—where slavery was quite different from the way it developed on the plantations of the Americas. And the article relates how Las Casas’ theoretical and practical defense of Amerindians eventually was extended by Las Casas’ into a defense of liberty for all men, including African slaves.
Explanation:
Well, two answers are very close and in a way both correct:
Having the freedom to do whatever someone wants
<span>Having the freedom to make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context
I would say the second one is better- one is rarely really free to do everything, as one is limited by resources etc, but autonomy would still mean being able to </span><span><span>make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context.</span> </span>
Answer:
Beth is most likely liable for "Appropriation".
Explanation:
Appropriation occurs when someone uses a name, image or any other form of another person's identity, to make financial gains, without first getting permission from the owner of the identity.
By using Chelsea's photo for an ad, without getting Chelsea's approval first, Beth is liable to Chelsea for appropriation.
