Most teenage deaths and illnesses are brought on by risky behaviors, which may be divided into four categories:
1. Use of cigarettes
2. Alcohol
3. Intoxicating substances.
4. Poor nutritional choices.
What are examples of high risk behaviors?
High-risk behaviors are defined as acts that increase the risk of disease or injury, which can subsequently lead to disability, death, or social problems. The most common high-risk behaviors include violence, alcoholism, tobacco use disorder, risky sexual behaviors, and eating disorders
Why do teenagers take risks?
Risk-taking increases among childhood and adolescence as a result of modifications around the time of puberty in the mind's socio-emotional system main to improved reward-searching for, particularly in the presence of friends, fueled mainly by a dramatic remodeling of the brain's dopaminergic system.
Learn more about Risk brainly.com/question/27754423
#SPJ9
The theorist who believed that children learn language when they are reinforced by parental attention was B.F.Skinner.
B.F.Skinner was a celebrated American psychologist who advanced the behaviorist theory of learning. This theory is based on the idea that learning occurs through a method of ‘conditioning’, which when stimulus, rewards, and punishments are combined to drive the learning process.
The conditioning relies on what Skinner calls reinforcement. Reinforcement is of two types, namely positive reinforcers, which are the rewards after meeting a target, and negative reinforcers, which refers to the unpleasant consequences of failing to meet the target.
Actions that are followed by negative reinforcers tend to weaken, while those followed by positive reinforcers tend to be repeated. For example, children can be encouraged to learn language if they receive consistent positive reinforcement from their parents every time they learn a new word or phrase.
To learn more about B.F. Skinner : brainly.com/question/10580861
#SPJ4
Answer:
If the outcomes of other procedure that were used are similar to the omitted procedure by giving relevant evidence.
Explanation:
Generally, it is common practice to use the same procedure for a given set of actions to obtain the desired result. This serves as a routine work and the outcome is always the same if the same procedure is followed each time. However, if there exists an alternative method or procedure that will give a similar outcome to the omitted procedure, there is no need to perform the omitted method/procedure.
Answer:
d. Giving too much influence to the wealthy.
Explanation:
Super PACs are a type of Political Action Committees, and PACs represent pools of campaing contributions and donates that money to the political candidates, in an United States elections. They channel funds for or against a candidate or a legislation.
Super PACs are officially known as independent-expenditure only committees, established in 2012. They engage in an unlimited political spending and are not tied to any political campaign. They can raise money from either individuals or corporations, and there are no legal limits on donation size. In that way, wealthy people can influence the outcome of the elections by spending unlimited amount of money for the support of their desired candidate.
Answer:
C) would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong?
Explanation:
Solomon Asch research was designed to answer a straightforward question, namely: <em>would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong? </em>This research was made by Asch to test conformity in ambiguous situations. Two important conclusions of the research are that people tend to conform to the majority of the group of opinion even if they know their answer is wrong, and that the size of the group is important when deciding.
