Answer:
For less than 7 uniforms.
Step-by-step explanation:
The first company she called charges $70 per uniform.
So, the cost of x uniforms will be $70x.
The second company she called charges $280 plus $30 per uniform.
So, the cost of x uniform will be $(280 + 30x).
Now, if the total cost of purchasing x number of uniforms from the first company is less than that from the second company then, we can write the inequality equation as
70x < 280 + 30x
⇒ 70x - 30x < 280
⇒ 40x < 280
⇒ x < 7
Therefore, for less than 7 uniforms the cost from the first company will be less than the cost from the second company. (Answer)
Answer:
D) 2275
Step-by-step explanation:
1 is irr 2 is rat 3 rat 4 rat 5 irr and 6 is irr
I would love to help you :)
So what do we know?:
We know that side A has a length of 25, and side B has a length of 21.
So that leaves us to find the length of side C correct?
Answer
Tbh I'm to lazy to explain how I got this and its mostly likely incorrect. but I think the answer is
4
(most likely incorrect LOL)
<u><em>IM SO SORRY IF I MADE YOU FAIL THE QUESTION SDNFKJSDFSDF</em></u>
-25x + 40
Step-by-step explanation:
-8 (4x-5) + 7x
-32x + 40 + 7x
-32x +7x + 40
-25x + 40
