Explanation is in the file
tinyurl.com/wpazsebu
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Feel free to ask more questions.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is <span>D.300°</span>.<span>
</span><span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.</span>
Well, the answer would bee 1/10 for a simple reason: the 3 in 7.315 is in the tenth's spot while the 3 in 893.5 is in the ones. a one spot different that can be proven with logic.
1/1/2 is the answer ............
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.