Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
45
Answer:
Yes, there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No ;
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 1000
x = 545
Phat = x / n = 545/1000 = 0.545
H0: p ≤ 0.5
H1: μ > 0.5
The test statistic :
(phat - p0) ÷ √(p(1 - P0) / n)
Test statistic :
(0.545 - 0.5) ÷ √(0.5(0.5) / 1000)
0.045 / 0.0158113
Test statistic = 2.846
α = 0.01
Decison :
Reject H0 ; if Pvalue < α
Using the Pvalue from Test statistic (Z) calculator :
Pvalue = 0.002214
With Pvalue < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No, making generalization about all women would not be reasonable as the data employed for the research mainly focuses on a particular
Ben has mixed up the digit for millions and hundred thousands: he wrote 5
in the place for millions and 6 in the place for hundred thousands, but
it should be the other way. I think that he should exchange those two digits in the faulty report.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
R(0,0)
A=((0+2a)/2,(0+2b)/2)=(a,b)
S(2a,2b)
B=((2a+2c)/2,(2b+2d)/2)=(a+c,b+d)
T(2c,2d)
C=((2c+2c)/2,(2d+0)/2)=(2c,d)
V(2c,0)
D=((2c+0)/2,(0+0)/2)=(c,0)
R(0,0)
slope of AB=(b+d-b)/(a+c-a)=d/c
slope of DC=(d-0)/(2c-c)=d/c
slope of AD=(0-b)/(c-a)=-b/(c-a)
slope of BC=(d-b-d)/(2c-a-c)=-b/(c-a)
Answer:
<h2>-36</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
