I answered a question like this before with the answer Target Market.
Answer:
Income = $30,000
Explanation
<em>Whenever a company is faced with a limiting factor i.e a resource in short supply, the company should allocate the resource to the product </em><u><em>with he highest contribution per unit of the scare resource</em></u>
Product Cont/unit machine hr /unit cont/hr Ranking
A $8 2 hrs $4/hr 2nd
B $18 3 hrs $6/hr 1st
<em>Hence the company should allocate the resource to the product B</em>
<em>Hence the total contribution</em>
= 5000 hrs × $6 per hr.
= $30,000
Income = $30,000
Answer: $77250
Explanation:
Your question isn't complete. I saw a similar question so here is it.
On July 15, 2021, Ortiz & Co. signed a contract to provide EverFresh Bakery with an ingredient-weighing system for a price of $79,200. The system included finely tuned scales that fit into EverFresh's automated assembly line, Ortiz's proprietary software modified to allow the weighing system to function in EverFresh's automated system, and a one-year contract to calibrate the equipment and software on an as-needed basis. (Ortiz competes with other vendors who offer ongoing calibration contracts for Ortiz's systems.) If Ortiz was to provide these goods or services separately, it would charge $51,000 for the scales, $10,000 for the software, and $39,000 for the calibration contract. Ortiz delivered and installed the equipment and software on August 1, 2021, and the calibration service commenced on that date. Assume that the scales, software and calibration service are viewed as one performance obligation. How much revenue will Ortiz recognize in 2021 for this contract?
This will be calculated as:
Scales = $51000
Add: Software = $10,000
Add: Calibration service = $39000 × 5/12 = $16250
The total revenue that will be recognized will be:
= $51000 + $10000 + 16250
= $77250
Answer:
The correct answer is b. It implies that prices reflect all available information.
Explanation:
The efficient market hypothesis is a theory initially enunciated by Eugene Fama (1970). It states that the current price of an asset in the market reflects all available information that exists (historical, public and private).
This theory considers that any news or future event that may affect the price of an asset will make the price adjust so quickly that it is impossible to obtain an economic benefit from it. Given this, it is considered a waste of time and money to try to analyze the values, since there will be no undervalued or overvalued assets in the market.
Answer:
b. $248,000
Explanation:
The computation of the cash receipts for October would be
Particulars October
Cash sales $60000
August credit Sales $22000 (10% of $220,000)
September Credit Sales $126000 (70% of $180,000)
October credit Sales $40000 (20% of $200,000)
Budgeted cash receipt $248000
Hence, the correct option is b.
