Answer:
Here are several reasons for that:
- Every society's population contains a lot of genetic mixture,
- Various racial categories are genetically very much alike,
- The skin color of Caucasian people ranges from very light to very dark.
Explanation:
The fact that there are a large number of similarities between people form different races and varieties between people from same race indicates that there are very little difference between races. (approximately, people form different races only has around 6% of genetic difference)
From the social perspective, differentiating and the racial difference tend to lead to tribalism that make groups of a certain race believe that the others are inferior compared to them. This will increase the risk of conflicts.
Answer:
The appointed judge does not run against an opponent.
Explanation:
A retention election is a type of election or voting process for the judges in practice. It is also known as judicial retention. It is a process which takes place at regular intervals where a judge in practice is subjected to a referendum whereby the voters are asked to vote whether the judge should continue for a second term or should be removed form the office.
In such processes, the judges loses very rarely because in this election process, the incumbent judge does have any opponent to contest against. It is the will of voters to decide whether a judge will continue the office or not.
Answer: No options listed.
Explanation: Economic growth happens when there is an increase in the inflation-adjusted market value of various goods and services in a period of time. There is an increase in the number of items produced or services offered which increases the money in an economy. Some factors that lead to economic growth are land, capital or technological growth and advancement.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
Amos Chocolate Chip Cookie Corporation
Explanation:
Debbi Fields Rose was the founder of a franchise called Mrs. Fields Original Cookies. Her company was considered as one of the largest freshly baked cookies/brownies retailers in United States.
During the early period of its founding, Debbi's largest competitor was a company called Famous Amos. Famous Amos produced a similar product as Fields' company, but already obtain a huge market share since it's founded around 2 years before Mrs. Fields Original Cookies company.
