The answer is b. many changes occurred throughout the countries hope it helps
Answer:
2- 4/5 1-3
Explanation:
The Supreme Court being able to declare a law unconstitutional is both a check on the executive branch and a power that is separated towards it.
Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
This heavily depends on many other factors and variables that will likely change in your lifetime. Right now, you’re a student, so it’s implausible for you to save large amounts because you most likely don’t earn the same amount of money the average adult does. However, further in your life, you might find that your income has risen significantly, so you can save a larger percentage of your income and keep it for your retirement.
