All categories

3 years ago

The area of a square is 36 square feet. Each side of the square measures

Mathematics

1 answer:

LenKa [72]3 years ago

3 0

6 because 6x6=36
-------------------

You might be interested in

1. Consider f(x) = 3x - 5

Rzqust [24]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have the function

$f(x)=3x-5$

We want to find the following ratio:

$\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$

Note that the limit of this for $h\rightarrow 0$ is equivalent to the derivative of the function.

Here we have:

$f(x+h)=3(x+h)-5=3x+3h-5$

And

$f(x)=3x-5$

Therefore we have

$f(x+h)-f(x)=3x+3h-5-(3x-5)=3h$

And therefore,

$\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}=\frac{3h}{h}=3$

4 0

3 years ago

Tory is solving the equation shown correctly in her notebook, but the paper gets smudged, and she cannot read the last few lines

elena55 [62]

This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:

A. - 4 = 5x

B. -4 = x

C. -4 + x = 0

D. -4 + 5x = 0

The correct next line of the solution is A. -4 = 5x

An equation is:

A mathematical expression that represents mathematical equality between two expressions.

It has two expressions and is separated by the equal sign, called members.

It has known elements and unknown or unknown data represented with letters like x

According to the above, it can be inferred that the correct answer is option A. because it expresses the correct values according to the operations that have been carried out in the previous lines.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/10413253

7 0

3 years ago

Which of these is the algebraic expression for "3 times the sum of 2 and y?"

11111nata11111 [884]

3(2 + y) <== ur expression

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jamal is 12 years older than twice Stephanie’s age. The sum of their ages is 45. A. If Stephanie’s age is represented by x, writ

amm1812

Answer:

Jamal's age = 2×x+12= 2x+12

sum og ages = 45

2x+12+x= 45

=3x+12=45

=45-12= 3x

= 32=3x

x= 32/3= 10.67

2x+13 =21.34+12= 33.34

hope.ot helps

plz mark as brainliest

4 0

3 years ago

From 1960 to 2010, a certain money stock measure was growing at the rate of approximately 43e(1/2)x billion dollars per decade,

natulia [17]

Answer:

1222 billion dollars.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the total increase from 1960 to 2010, we need to find the growth of each decade and sum them all:

In the period 1960-1970, we have x = 1, and the growth is:

$y(1) = 43e(1/2) = 70.895$

In the period 1970-1980, we have x = 2, and the growth is:

$y(2) = 43e(2/2) = 116.8861$

The growth in the following 3 periods are:

$y(3) = 43e(3/2) =192.7126$

$y(4) = 43e(4/2) = 317.7294$

$y(5) = 43e(5/2) =523.8472$

So the total growth in the period 1960 - 2010 is:

$Total = y(1) + y(2) + y(3) + y(4) + y(5)$

$Total = 70.895 + 116.8861+192.726+317.7294+523.8472$

$Total = 1222.08\ billion\ dollars$

Rounding to the nearest billion dollars, we have a total of 1222 billion dollars.

6 0

3 years ago