The sum clearly diverges. This is indisputable. The point of the claim above, that

is to demonstrate that a sum of infinitely many terms can be manipulated in a variety of ways to end up with a contradictory result. It's an artifact of trying to do computations with an infinite number of terms.
The mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan famously demonstrated the above as follows: Suppose the series converges to some constant, call it

. Then

Now, recall the geometric power series

which holds for any

. It has derivative

Taking

, we end up with

and so

But as mentioned above, neither power series converges unless

. What Ramanujan did was to consider the sum

as a limit of the power series evaluated at

:

then arrived at the conclusion that

.
But again, let's emphasize that this result is patently wrong, and only serves to demonstrate that one can't manipulate a sum of infinitely many terms like one would a sum of a finite number of terms.
Answer: .123
Step-by-step explanation: use random variable e-s which will follow a normal distribution with a mean of 70-60=10 and SD= sq root of 25+49. P(e-s<0)=.123
There are 2000 pounds in a ton - so the rino weighs 3.75 x 2000 = 7500 pounds
a percentage can be converted to a decimal - if you want to know what 3.8% of a number is, move the decimal two spaces to the left 3.8% is 0.038 -
Multiply 7500 pounds by 0.038 - the answer is 285 pounds.
A. - 7x² + 7x + 1 + 8 = 0
- 7x² + 7x + 9 = 0
x = - b ± √b² - 4ac / 2a
= - 7 ± √7² - 4 (-7) (9) / 2 (-7)
= - 7 ± √49 + 252 / - 14
= - 7 ± √ 301 / - 14
x = - 7 + 17.349 / - 14 x = - 7 - 17.349 / - 14
= 10.349 / - 14 = - 24.349 / - 14
= - 0.739 = - 1.739
B. 8x² - 5x² + 6x + 1 = 0
3x² + 6x + 1 = 0
x = - b ± √b² - 4ac / 2a
= - (-5) ± √-5² - 4 (3) (1) / 2 (3)
= 5 ± √25 - 12 / 6
= 5 ± √ 13 / 6
x = 5 + 3.606 /6 x = - 5 - 3.606 / 6
= 8.606/6 = - 8.606/6
= 1.434. = - 1.434
please re-check the answers hope this helps