Without heroes, we cannot have monsters. If there were no monsters to cause problems, we would have no need for superheroes. The only reason heroes are present is because they feel that it is their duty to fight off the monsters, and protect humankind from evil.
Here is a part you can use. :)
You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
I believe that the answer for this one would be option C. The end result of Sir Lancelot's perilous adventure is that, King <span>Arthur made him a Knight of the Round Table. Other options given are incorrect. Hope this answers your question. </span>
I am pretty sure that the coreect answer which show the similarities of rock pile and the apartment in the rock pile by James Baldwin is being revealed be the second statement from the scale represented above : Both have a feeling of danger. And if more that one is possible, I'd choose this one : Both are centers of the community.
