The author argues for broadening the scope of what is considered literature and what is okay to teach in classrooms.
Explanation:
The author's argument is that the television and film have been forays old enough to be morally and culturally significant as literature as a large population grows up with exposure to it and its existence shapes their worldview too.
Thus it can be taught in the schools to show what is good and what is not on these forms too as well as to understand what is important in cultural context in these art forms too and what must be preserved as a society.
If your options are these:
<span>A) It is very difficult to fully enjoy nature by oneself.
B ) To experience nature to its fullest requires mental effort.
C) No human being can fully and truly experience nature.
D)The enjoyment of nature is something that takes practice.
It might be said that the best option is B </span>To experience nature to its fullest requires mental effort because Emerson believed that the power in nature is due to nature and to human´s intelligence. What is more, Nature could help "individuals to be more content within society".
Answer:
All of the options represent qualities of an omniscient narrator.
Explanation:
Omniscient is a literary technique of writing a narrative in third person, in which the narrator knows the feelings and thoughts of every character in the story.
An omniscient narrator can tell or show the reader what each character thinks and feels in a scene, freely, because she/he/it is not one of them.
