Answer:
C) The court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
Explanation:
From the case it is clear that the contract happens between Beau and the Manager of XYZ is of selling the carpet only. The service on the other hand, is not a department of UCC. The service contracts are department of common law whereas sales of goods law is applied to UCC or Uniform Commercial Code. So, except this option, all other options are false.
Answer:
The cost of goods available for sale is $650,100
Explanation:
Credit terms of 3/15, n/45 means that 3% discount for the payment within 15 days and the full amount to be paid within 45 days.
The discounts Northwest Fur Co. took = $560,000 x 3% = $16,800
Northwest uses a perpetual inventory system and the gross method to record purchases.
Net Purchases = Purchases - Purchase Returns - Purchases Discounts + Freight-In = $560,000 - $4,900 - $16,800 + $8,800 = $547,100
The cost of goods available for sale = Beginning merchandise inventory + Net Purchases = $103,000 + $547,100 = $650,100
Accumulated Balance is given by :
Here,
n = time period = 30×12 = 360.
P = principal price = $250.
Putting all given values in above equation, we get :
Hence, this is the required solution.
Answer:No, Because the signed agreement was for previous violations, it does not cover future violations.
Explanation: Trademarks are intellectual property rights that is represented by appropriate signs, pictures etc signifying that the owner of the product has the right to the trade if certain types of product or products.
Trademark are legally approved rights that any violations can lead to severe consequences based on the enabling laws as enshrined in the constitution of a country.
I believe it is C, hope this helps!!
