1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marrrta [24]
3 years ago
5

The manufacturer of a metal stand for home TV sets must be sure that its product will not fail under the weight of the TV. Since

some larger sets weigh nearly 350 ​pounds, the​ company's safety inspectors have set a standard of ensuring that the stand can support an average of over 575 pounds. Their inspectors regularly subject a random sample of the stands to increasing weight until they fail. They test the hypothesis Upper H 0​: muequals575 against Upper H Subscript Upper A​: mugreater than575​, using the level of significance alphaequals0.01. If the sample of stands fails to pass this safety​ test, the inspectors will not certify the product for sale to the general public. The manufacturer is thinking of revising its safety test. Complete parts a through c below.
a) is this an upper-tail or lower tall test? In the context off the problem, Why is this important
This is an upper-tail test because the company wants to show the stands will hold 525 pounds (or more) easily.
This is a lower-tail test because the weight of the TV sets must be less than the strength of the stands.
This is an upper-tail test because the TV sets will be placed on top of the stands.
This is a lower-tail test because the company tests the strength of the stands by starting with a weight below the desired strength and gradual increasing it.

b) Explain what will happen if the inspectors commit a Type l error. Choose the correct answer below.
They will decide the stands are safe when they're not.
They will decide the stands will hold 350 pounds easily when in fact the stands can hold 525 pounds easily.
They will decide the stands will hold 525 pounds easily when in fact the stands can only hold 350 pounds easily.
They will decide the stands are unsafe when they are in fact safe.

c) Explain what will happen if the inspectors commit a Type II error. Choose the correct answer below.
They will decide the stands are unsafe when they are in fact safe.
They will decide the stands will hold 350 pounds easily when in fact the stands can hold 525 pounds easily.
They will decide the stands will hold 525 pounds easily when in fact the stands can only hold 350 pounds easily.
They will decide the stands are safe when they're not.
Mathematics
1 answer:
ikadub [295]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a) "This is an upper-tail test because the company wants to show the stands will hold 525 pounds (or more) easily."

b) "They will decide the stands are safe when they're not."

c) "They will decide the stands are unsafe when they are in fact safe."

Step-by-step explanation:

a) As the alternative hypothesis Ha is μ>575, the rejection region lays in the upper tail. Then, it is an upper-tail test.

They are testing the claim that the stand supports an average of 575 pounds or more, and are looking for statistical evidence for that claim.

"This is an upper-tail test because the company wants to show the stands will hold 525 pounds (or more) easily."

b)  A Type I error happens when a true null hypothesis is rejected.

This would mean that a stands that doesn't really hold 575 pounds or more has passed the test. The stand would appear more safe than it is.

"They will decide the stands are safe when they're not."

c) A Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis failed to be rejected. In this case, a safe stand, that suports 575 pounds or more, does not pass the test.

"They will decide the stands are unsafe when they are in fact safe."

You might be interested in
Jenny bought a desk on sale for 119.60 the price was 75% less than the original price was the original price
olasank [31]

Answer:

100 - 75 = 25%

25%=119.60

need to find 1%

25/25=1%

119.60/25=1%

1%=4.784

now multiply by 100 to find original price

100% = 478.40

original price £478.40

5 0
3 years ago
The result of subtracting 2 from its opposite is
belka [17]
It’s four because you subtract 2 minus negative 2
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
???????????i need help on this ASAP!!!!
ioda
Super easy all you do is grab 3500*0.7306 which equals 2557.1 2557.1 is correct hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A restaurant had a special on hamburger meal deals. They marked down the meals from $7 to $4. How much would you SAVE on 5 meal
vichka [17]

I did say the answer is $35. Because, you should use the highest factor or whatever operation the problem is using, to find the answer. Not sure if it's some two-step problem....

3 0
3 years ago
The expression is equal to listen to thi the expression is equal to this 4(2x 11-x)
vaieri [72.5K]
8x-44-4x or simply 4x-44
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, 5/5 RATING, AND LIKE!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Y^8+6y^4+8/y^8+5y^4+6
    7·1 answer
  • What are the correct trigonometric ratios that could be used to determine the length of LN? Check all that apply
    7·2 answers
  • Find the distance between<br> 2 - 4<br> and<br> 6 + i
    8·1 answer
  • When y=3. Which expression is equivalent to 5y-7y
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!! 35POINTS!!
    15·1 answer
  • Help please, 25 points
    15·1 answer
  • I need help with this question
    6·1 answer
  • Write the equation of the line that passes through the points (-4,8) and (1,3)
    5·1 answer
  • A local country officials need to calculate the capacity of a large hole for the garbage refuse dump. The dump hole is 250 feet
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!