Answer:
Explanation:
For example: Suppose you want to check the average working hour of employees. You may think that the average duration of an employees is 7.6 hours. You want to check this claim so you collect a sample of 20 employees and note their duration of work. (please check attached file for this, and continue)
NULL HYPOTHESIS H0:u= 7.6 HOURS
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS Ha: ≠7.6 HOURS
alpha=0.05
t= 7.765-7.6/1.25/sqrt(20)
t= 0.165/1.25/4.47
t= 0.165/0.28
t= 0.589
degrees of freedom= n-1=20-1=19
t critical = 2.09
Since t critical is GREATER than t calculated therefore we fail to reject null hypothesis H0.
From this we can conclude that We don't have enough or sufficient evidence to say that the mean working duration is different than 7.6 hours.
The law of increasing opportunity cost is represented by law of diminishing returns,
Answer:
B: a service that pays bills without the need of consumer verification
Explanation:
have a great day! :>
Answer:
D. Order the parties to arbitrate
Explanation:
Under an arbitration agreement, the parties to such a contract mutually agree to settling future disputes outside court.
Like every contract, such a contract is legally binding and the terms cannot be revoked by one of the parties later. The parties are bound by arbitration in such cases, as is mutually agreed initially.
As per the facts of the case, such an arbitration agreement has been entered into by Jan and Kyle, wherein it was mutually agreed to settle outside court, in the event of a dispute. When the said dispute arose, Jan filed a suit against Kyle.
In such a scenario, the court will likely D. Order the parties to arbitrate.
Answer: The actual cost of materials was less than the standard cost
Explanation:
Net materials cost variance = Favorable materials price variance + Favorable materials quantity variance
= 380 + (-120 unfavorable)
= 380 - 120
= $260 favorable
<em>As the materials cost variance is favorable, it means that the actual cost of materials was less than what was budgeted for it or rather its standard cost. </em>