The magnetic form of a substance can be determined<span> by examining its electron configuration: if it shows unpaired electrons, then the substance is paramagnetic; if all electrons are paired, the substance is diamagnetic.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
given,
s = 400- 16 t²
we know,
Velocity of an object is defined as the change in displacement per unit change in time.
velocity an also be return as
Hence, instantaneous velocity function given by
To calculate instantaneous velocity, you need to insert value of time.
ex, instantaneous velocity at t = 4 s
v = -32 x 4 = -128 m/s.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The "guide to Engineering and land surveying" for professional engineers and land surveyors by the California board reviews that an unlicensed person cannot be a sole owner of an engineering business, unless there is partnership with a licensed engineer.
Answer:
0.0675 seconds
Explanation:
From the question,
We apply newton's second law of motion
F = m(v-u)/t.................... Equation 1
Where F = force exert by the brake, v = final speed, u = initial speed m = mass of the bicycle, t = time.
make t the subject of the equation
t = m(v-u)/F................... Equation 2
Given: m = 180 kg, u = 6.0 m/s, v = 0 m/s (comes to stop), F = -1600 N ( agianst the dirction of motion)
Substitute these value into equation 2
t = 180(0-6.0)/-1600
t = -1080/-1600
t = 0.0675 seconds.
The statement about pointwise convergence follows because C is a complete metric space. If fn → f uniformly on S, then |fn(z) − fm(z)| ≤ |fn(z) − f(z)| + |f(z) − fm(z)|, hence {fn} is uniformly Cauchy. Conversely, if {fn} is uniformly Cauchy, it is pointwise Cauchy and therefore converges pointwise to a limit function f. If |fn(z)−fm(z)| ≤ ε for all n,m ≥ N and all z ∈ S, let m → ∞ to show that |fn(z)−f(z)|≤εforn≥N andallz∈S. Thusfn →f uniformlyonS.
2. This is immediate from (2.2.7).
3. We have f′(x) = (2/x3)e−1/x2 for x ̸= 0, and f′(0) = limh→0(1/h)e−1/h2 = 0. Since f(n)(x) is of the form pn(1/x)e−1/x2 for x ̸= 0, where pn is a polynomial, an induction argument shows that f(n)(0) = 0 for all n. If g is analytic on D(0,r) and g = f on (−r,r), then by (2.2.16), g(z) =
