Yes, that's possible.
Happened in both the 2000 election and the 2016 election, where both times, the Democratic candidate had the popular vote, but lost the EC vote.
Whether or not it's fair is up to who you ask. Conservatives believe it's fair because the EC gives more representation to the smaller states, while Democrats believe it's unfair because people who vote against the majority in the state are not represented and because it has an inaccurate representation of the population of the United States.
Answer:
Explanation:
when only one participant wielded a threat (used the gate to block the opponent), the person with the gate won more money
When both participants could wield threats, both sides lost money.
The case must first be heard at the lowest level of court. Most states have a court system that exists in the same area as a federal magistrate court or federal district court. The case must be decided by the lower court and appealed to a higher court. In the federal system this is the circuit court. Once all the lower courts have been exhausted, the lawyers may apply to be heard by the <span>Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will determine which cases it will hear.
</span>
Answer:
The best and most accurate answer between the choices would be the second one. As the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was reached, it stated that Congress cannot prevent slave trade, but could tax slaves that are imported. Hopefully the answer has come to your help.
Explanation:
