Answer:
made a necessary change to the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
Prior to Roe V. Wade, the right to privacy already acknowledged but never really extended to women's decision regarding what to do to their body. (It's only protect things such as banning companies from spying on their phone conversation, or prohibiting parents from entering their children private room, etc)
But after Roe V. wade, a necessary change was added to the Bill of Rights. The Right of privacy now extended to women's privacy to choose the actions that they do to their own body. This became a landmark decision that legalize abortion in united states.
Answer:
A. Stated in broad terms to allow for flexibility
Explanation:
During the briefing, incident objectives will be presented to all the person involved as the main goal of the operation.
Flexibility<em><u> is allowed in finding methods /ways to achieve</u></em> the goals , BUT <u><em>flexibility cannot be allowed in determining the goal itself. \</em></u>
<em> </em>Stating the objectives in broad terms to allow flexibility only create the risk of confusion, which make team members have different ideas of what needed to be achieved.
To ensure that all the team members work harmoniously, objectives need to be Logically attainable, can be measured by a specific standard, include time frame that specify when the objectives needed to be done, and it also need to stay within the commander's jurisdiction.
Answer:
that is true.
Explanation:
Girls were terrified of some woman in the village so they accused them of being witches.
Answer: Smith—permissive; Jones—authoritarian; Johnson—rejecting-neglecting
Explanation: The Smith's are lenient. They don't expect much from their children but they shower all the love and care for their children. This is an example of permissive parenting.
The Jones's are authoritarian. This is just an opposite of permissive parenting. They expect much but show less care.
The Johnson's are rejecting-neglecting. They don't expect anything from the kids and they don't care either.
This is an example of a "harm reduction model".
The idea of 'harm reduction' alludes to an arrangement of approaches, projects, and practices that expect to lessen the wellbeing, social, and financial outcomes of medication and liquor manhandle.
Basically, harm reduction recognizes that totally going without drugs isn't a sensible answer for everybody and that numerous individuals overall utilize medications and liquor despite the solid endeavors of different associations and governments to advance aggregate forbearance.
