the start of the play, Romeo is a hopeless romantic, That is to say, He is in love with his enemy's daughter 1 day after breaking up with his first love, for example, at the start of the play when Romeo is talking with Benvolio, Romeo says: “bid a sick man in sadness make his will- a word ill urg’d to one that is so ill: in sadness, cousin, i do love a woman.” He is saying that he is in love with Rosaline but a couple days later he is in love with juliet, he say this to juliet: “My lips, two blushing pilgrims, ready stand to smooth that rough touch with a tender kiss” He confessing love for juliet even though he just broke up Rosaline, this shows me that Romeo falls for people to easily and he is hopeless romantic who doesn’t understand …show more content… When Romeo finds out about Juliet’s death, he rushes to her tomb only to find paris, kills him, finds juliet and then kills himself. For example, by the end of act 5 he says; “O my love, my wife, Death, that hath suck’d the honey honey of thy breath, Hath had no power yet upon thy beauty.” He is explaining how he loves her and she didn’t need to die. Another example is; “Here’s to my love! O true apothecary! Thy drugs are quick. Thus with a kiss i die.” He has killed himself over a girl he barely knew. This shows me that Romeo is being dramatic and foolish when he kill paris and himself. In conclusion, Romeo is a foolish young boy who overreacts when a girl he just me dies. In conclusion of this entire essay, Romeo is a victim of fate, Romeo is a rash and emotional young man. He feels deeply and acts quickly, often without thinking through his actions. His attitude towards love is over-enthusiastic. Romeo believes that love is what makes life worthwhile, which is why he is so desperate to be in love. He stays in love with Rosaline, even after she rejects him, up to the point when he falls in love with Juliet.
Answer:
d. To study logic it is important to learn to employ language precisely
Explanation:
Our ability to communicate and be able to express what we have in mind through words is something that has characterized us as living beings.
Being able to schematize our ideas from a linguistic basis is one of the foundations of logic. The language we use carries with it the meaning of our reality, without this part there would be nothing for us.
On the practical level, if a person must speak or think in a language other than the native one, logic and mental flow simply feel natural for that particular language.
Each language has a particular way of categorizing mental concepts. There are data that correlate the learning of multiple languages with the stretching of the plasticity of our brain.
Our conceptual understanding is, at best, tenuous with respect to the logic of language. The circumstantial evidence points to a schematism in human language that is highly restricted, but also very rich and easy.
