A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
Answer:
The three different branches of government include Legislative, Judiciary, and Executive. The different branches work with checks and balances to keep each other "in check." THinking about it, is that where the phrase, "in check" comes from?
Why each are important:
The Legislative makes the laws. (Congress, Senate, and House of Representatives)
The Executive enforces the laws.
THe Judiciary interprets the laws.
A primary source. That would be a source coming directly from someone who was in the war so you know it is reliable and probably the most accurate. A secondary source could be from a journalist or an outside mind that doesn't know the true experience of being in the war and is just observing from an outsiders view.
Answer: Caracteristicas de una persona solidaria:
1 Son personas que ayudan sin distincion alguna o discrimacion.
2 Suelen ser personas empaticas.
3 Son capaces abrir espacios sin exclusión alguna.
4 Tienden a ser personas con mucho amor y cariño que transmitir.
5 Son conocedoras de las situaciones sociales.
¿Puedo obtener un brainliest
Explanation:
Answer:
We have to find the author, time, intended audience, main idea, context, bias, and accuracy of the text.
Author - a candidate for government office.
Time - government election campaign.
Intended audience - potential voters.
Main idea - the candidate is the only one who can be trusted with taxpayer money, and this is crucial because taxpayer money is being wasted.
Context - Government intervention does more harm than good: raising taxes on successful businesses to fund failing public schools only has the effect of both reducing wealth creation, and educating children poorly.
Bias - the candidate has anti-goverment bias.
Accuracy - the candidate does not provide evidence to back his claims in the speech, thus, the accuracy of it cannot be properly gauged.
