1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Furkat [3]
3 years ago
6

Define the Marbury vs. Madison case

Law
2 answers:
KIM [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall

weqwewe [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It established Judicial Review that all Federal Courts has the right to review bills that are passed by the legislative branch, and signed by the executive branch; The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. it also pave ways for state courts to follow along deeming state constitution.

You might be interested in
As an entrepreneur, you’ll face lots of tough and sometimes ethical decisions. In the situation described below, what do you thi
Kay [80]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:idk

6 0
3 years ago
Alice is a marketing representative employed by a health plan. Betty is a captive agent of a health plan who markets to multiple
romanna [79]
insurance but go to court
And ask judges and ask FDA about insurance and will lead you to it
4 0
3 years ago
What evidences was found in “Bones S03E04 The Secret in the Soil”?
KATRIN_1 [288]
Skin slippage 1st victim pushed second one melted
4 0
1 year ago
If you were a juror in a murder case, and the DNA, blood, fingerprints, or other scientific evidence conflicted with what witnes
Llana [10]

Answer:

if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)

3 0
2 years ago
Could Miranda be tried again for the same crime? <br><br> I need a good skid answer plz
allochka39001 [22]
ANSWER:

Yes, Miranda could be tried twice again for the same crime.

EXPLANATION:

After the Supreme Court ruling, Miranda retracted his confession, was tried again by the state of Arizona, found guilty and sent to prison. His retrial, based on a prisoner's successful appeal, did not constitute “double jeopardy” according to the court.

goodluck, support me by marking as brainliest!! :)
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • High winds make it much harder to _____. A. steer your vehicle B. stop your vehicle C. see the road ahead D. accelerate quickly
    15·2 answers
  • The philosophy of law, or the science and study of law, is known as what?
    14·2 answers
  • Would you be willing to be a whistle blower? On what type of issue would you blow the whistle? Inflated overtime submitted on a
    10·1 answer
  • When a company goes public, it begins doing what?
    13·1 answer
  • This passage MOST accurately reflects the democratic ideals taken from
    5·2 answers
  • Sara does not often ask questions about her father's past. He emigrated to the United States and tells her that the man he was b
    12·1 answer
  • If you accidently take someone's jacket, believing that it is your own, it is still larceny.
    9·1 answer
  • Please answer quickly if you can:)
    7·1 answer
  • What is the definition of "Constitutional Monarchy"? And what is the importance of it?
    8·2 answers
  • The principles evolved by the courts in England in interpreting statutes are adopted and applied with local
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!