<em>To recognize a transaction on an account. For example, if one writes a check for $100 and $100 is deducted from that account three days later, the transaction is set to post on the third day.</em>
Answer:
No the suit will not succeed as their is no agreement
Explanation:
The contract was conditional contract. As the condition explicitly said that, the right to agree on terms and conditions is explicitly attorney's right. When the attorney has not agreed on the terms and conditions of Harbor Park, the company hasn't formed any contract. Furthermore, there is no limitation on Grondas to consider other available options and attorney is also not obliged to agree to Harbor's offer.
Thus the suit that says Grondas has breached the contract is meaningless and will not succeed in the court.
Answer:
D. have separate cost allocation rates for each activity identified by the company CORRECT
There will be activity cost pool which, will be distribute among the product using different cost driver like machien hours, direct labor hours or other.
Explanation:
A. have the same cost allocation system as plantwide and departmental cost allocation systems
NO If it was, then it would not have a different name
B. have no cost allocation rates for each activity identified by the company
If we don't have rates to distrubte cost then, the allocation will be arbitrary
C. have combined cost allocation rates for each activity identified by the company
each should have different base cost driver if not, then they aren't different and should be combined.
The answer is a request for proposal
If this helps mark me the brainiest please and thank you
