Answer:
C. Earthquake
Explanation:
Han dynasty was known as one of the most devastating period in Chinese agricultural history. The country experiences series of natural disasters that destroyed a lot of Their agricultural lands.
It started from deforestation ordered by the empire in order to make various equipment's and infrastructure for the military's.
Trees have the ability prevent sediment runoff which can hold a huge amount of water. During the period of heavy rain, the amount of water that can usually sustained by the forest were let loose and came down to the citizens' resident. Destroying a lof of their farms in the process.
After that, the han dynasty had to deal with the exact opposite situation, when the country undergone some period of drought when very little rainfall happen. This also caused a lot of crop failures due to inability to fulfill the crops' water needs.
Since, options are not given, the question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows:
Which supreme court procedure involves justices discussing a case, debating its key issues, and arriving at their own opinions on the appropriate ruling?
a. deliberation
b. judicial review
c. sharing opinions
d. public arguments
Answer: b. judicial review
Explanation:
Judicial review can be defined as the power of the court to examine the case in the court of law and actions of the executive, administration and legislature of the country. The judicial review can be given a judge of court or jury. The judge of the Supreme Court is expected to give fair opinion. The jury of supreme court can discuss about a case.
The stage of Piagets Sensorimotor that this represents is the Secondary circular reactions.
<h3>What are Secondary circular reactions?</h3>
This is a stage of repetitive action that takes place in children that are aged 4 to 6 months.
These kinds of actions shows the aim of the child in trying to make things happen. Omar here shakes the car keys repeatedly due to the sounds that he hears.
Read more on the psychologist Piaget here: brainly.com/question/3648034
Answer:
My dear reader, the rule of law is not a respecter of person or group of persons. Every soul and institutions is equal before the law. Hence, no one is above the law. In any criminal trial, the onus of proving the guilt against an accused person arraigned before a court of law beyond reasonable doubt rest squarely on the prosecution unless, in some special cases when the prosecution closes its case having called witnesses to testify against an accused person.