Answer:
I can't answer it without a picture (o´･_･)っ
Explanation:
please send a picture
When a justice agrees with the majority decision but disagrees with the rationale presented in the majority opinion, he or she may write a concurring opinion.
The concurring opinion is a written opinion that filed by a judge which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court.
<span>This best represents WILLFUL IGNORANCE as a source of prejudicial attitudes.An African-American came to our family's Christmas celebration for the first time ever two days ago. It was a lurching sea change for people who are caustically racist on the whole. I think the above example exemplifies the attitude that economic dependence increases willful ignorance in tight knit social/family structures. In other words, you take on the social cue's of your family because you depend on their approval for your survival. This is a common theme throughout the south where the perception of limited opportunity exerts control and subsequent conformity of people as they form their racial views.</span>
The correct answer should be B. Shared expenses
While you all would spend money on the same food which you would share, you would definitely not have more room or greater privacy since there would be more people to intrude.
