The time required to get a total amount of $3,300.00 with compounded interest on a principal of $1,650.00 at an interest rate of 6.2% per year and compounded 12 times per year is 11.209 years. hence the answer is
A. 2001
<h3>Compound Interest Calculation</h3>
(about 11 years 3 months)
First, convert R as a percent to r as a decimal
r = R/100
r = 6.2/100
r = 0.062 per year,
Then, solve the equation for t
t = ln(A/P) / n[ln(1 + r/n)]
t = ln(3,300.00/1,650.00) / ( 12 × [ln(1 + 0.062/12)] )
t = ln(3,300.00/1,650.00) / ( 12 × [ln(1 + 0.0051666666666667)] )
t = 11.209 years
Learn more about Compound Interest here:
brainly.com/question/24924853
#SPJ1
Answer:
Cost of goods sold = $960,839
Explanation:
Preparing cost of goods sold budget:
Number of units to be sold = 20,000 - 675 = 19,325
As for the information provided:
Direct Materials = $14 
19,325 = $270,550
Direct Labor hours = 1.9 19,325 = 36,717.5
Direct Labor Cost = $16 36,717.5 = $587,480
Variable overhead = $1.20 36,717.5 = $44,061
Fixed overhead = $1.60 36,717.50 = $58,748
Therefore, cost of goods sold = $960,839.
Hello There!
Your answer would be <u>C). A tortious act may also be a criminal act.</u>
The reason why C would be your answer is because a tortious act is something that harms someone in any way. The reason why it "may" be a criminal act is because determine if the tortious act is a criminal act really depends on the scenario that is occurring. For example, someone could cause a tortious act in a way of self defense, this scenario would be debatable because the person that committed the tortious act had a valid reason in doing so, and that was protecting themselves. But, if a person was to cause a tortious act by hurting someone to steal from them, then that would definitely be a criminal act because they are performing dangerous things to someone else, and the person could file a lawsuit against it.
Let's dive into why the other answer choices are incorrect. We can use the old fashion process of elimination:
Answer choice "A). A tortious act is always a criminal act" is incorrect because it is not always a criminal act, it depends on the scenario it's in. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "B). A criminal act is always a tortious act" is incorrect because there are MANY criminal acts that doesn't harm anyone, for example, tax evasion (not paying taxes) is a criminal act, but does not cause any harm to anyone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D). A tortious act is the same as a contract dispute" is incorrect because harming someone is not the same as not doing what a contract says. A contact dispute is when someone that's part of a contract did not do a duty that the contract says that they're suppose to do, and that usually doesn't have to be any harm to anyone. That would not be the same as a tortious act, harming someone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
