Answer:
very confused but okayyyy
Answer:
The correct total time is nineteen (19) days instead of twenty-one days.
Explanation:
Given the analysis of time for the project in parenthesis, it is feasible to merge some of the activities together by carrying them out simultaneously.
For example:
In the course of arranging and confirming the training facility to use which will last for 3 days, the development of the training material that ought to last for 5 days is brought down to a 2 days work because the initial 3 days for arrangement becomes vacant pending the reply on the final day. This brings the total days from 8 to 5.
Other days remain thus:
• Send an e-mail message to all department managers (1 day)
• Print copies of handout (2 days)
• Develop a set of PowerPoint slides (5 days)
• Conduct a practice training session with the instructor (2 days)
• Conduct the user training sessions (4 days).
Hence, total days are as follow:
5 +1 + 2 + 5 + 2 + 4 = 19 days.
The answer to this question is C, $5,790. Jeff will need $5,790.
Answer:
$380
Explanation:
Ziva's total cost of farming is composed of two different costs: explicit and implicit costs.
Explicit cost is an out-of-pocket cost that a person incurs to carry out a particular business activity. It is sort of, a business-related expense for which the business pays. In Ziva's case, it is $130, the cost of the seeds
Implicit costs are opportunity costs. An opportunity cost refers the benefits an individual, investor or business misses out on when opting for one alternative in preference of another. In our case, it amounts to $250($25*10 hours)
Thus, Ziva's cost of farming
= $130 +( $25*10) = $130 +$250 = $380
Answer:
latter, latter
Explanation:
Property rights system determine how economic resources are used and owned by individuals, associations, collectives, or governments.
It also includes intellectual property such as inventions or ideas.
Such rights reduce destructive competition for control of economic resources. and replace this competition by peaceful means.
In a system where people are allowed to keep one-third of the monetary rewards of their labor with a system in which they keep two-thirds, we should expect more entrepreneurship under the <u>latter</u> system and faster real economic growth under the <u>latter</u> system.
