Answer:
a. $24,000
Explanation:
60,000 fixed cost which, are allocated in the base of expected copies:
total expected copies: 600,000 + 400,000 = 1,000,000
Copy Center 2 represent 400,000 / 1,000,000 = 40% of the total copies volume for the period
Therefore from the 60,000 fixed cost the 40% was applied.
60,000 x 40 % = 24,000
Answer:
$22,800
Explanation:
Calculation for the total amount of indirect manufacturing cost incurred
First step is to find the fixed manufacturing overhead portion
Fixed manufacturing overhead portion=$3.00 *5000 units
Fixed manufacturing overhead portion =$15,000
Second step is to calculate the indirect manufacturing cost if 6,000 units are produced using this formula
Indirect manufacturing cost =Fixed manufacturing overhead portion
+ Variable portion
Let plug in the formula
Indirect manufacturing cost=$15,000 + ($1.30*6,000 units)
Indirect manufacturing cost=$15,000+$7,800
Indirect manufacturing cost=$22,800
Therefore the total amount of indirect manufacturing cost incurred is closest to $22,800
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
Answer:
warranty liablity account ending balance: 3,510,000
Explanation:
In total, we expect a warranty expense for 6% for each sale distributed among three years.
For the 32,000,000 million sales for 2019 we expect:
32,000,000 x 6% = 1,920,000 warranty expense.
warranty liaiblity
debit credit
beginning 3,370,000
expenditures 1,780,000
warranty expense <u> 1,920,000</u>
balance 3,510,000
D is. It's very wrong to underestimate somebody's abilities or knowledge. We should never do that. It's also rude.
