Answer:well for the first one I am not sure but I think that since four is over the x there should be 4/x + 3 so tragically I don’t know the answer but I think it should be 12 the x should be 12 because 4x3=12 so yea 12
Step-by-step explanation:and for the other one I don’t know but ima try it should be two because 2x2=4 and so y=1-2x2-4 that’s what I think sorry. I got it wrong and do good on your test for me please
6 and -3
6 + -3 = 3
6 x -3 = -18
Hope that helps!
Answer:
Interval [16.34 , 21.43]
Step-by-step explanation:
First step. <u>Calculate the mean</u>

Second step. <u>Calculate the standard deviation</u>



As the number of data is less than 30, we must use the t-table to find the interval of confidence.
We have 6 observations, our level of confidence DF is then 6-1=5 and we want our area A to be 80% (0.08).
We must then choose t = 1.476 (see attachment)
Now, we use the formula that gives us the end points of the required interval

where n is the number of observations.
The extremes of the interval are then, rounded to the nearest hundreth, 16.34 and 21.43
Answer: 35 additional teachers are needed
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Explanation:
We have 2470 students and the ratio of students to teachers is 26:1. This means that for every teacher, there are 26 students. Put another way, we can set up this ratio
2470/x = 26/1
where x is the number of teachers. Cross multiply and solve for x
2470/x = 26/1
2470*1 = 26*x
2470 = 26x
26x = 2470
26x/26 = 2470/26
x = 95
So we have 95 teachers currently
-------------
Let y be the new number of teachers needed to bring the ratio down to 19:1
Using a similar idea as done above, we would have this ratio
2470/y = 19/1
Let's solve for y
2470/y = 19/1
2470*1 = 19*y
2470 = 19y
19y = 2470
19y/19 = 2470/19
y = 130
So we'll need 130 teachers to have the ratio be 19:1
The difference of the values is y - x = 130 - 95 = 35, which is the final answer. This is the additional amount of teachers needed.
2.5 hours i think but i might be wrong :)