Answer:
No it would not have been successful because Gandhi and everyone else who started to create big movements never used force to convey the bigger message. The king in Britain would send troops to stop the uprising if he saw things were getting out of control. Nonviolence was a good approach because this allowed everyone's voices to be heard and prevent unwanted anger if something were to happen to the people that were trying to protest violently. This also effectively brought change to the world because the king really wanted peace in his territories. He only wanted them to be ruled by him and wanted no unrest. He didn't care what they talked about as long as the people didn't over throw him.
Made for easier travel transport comunication and expansion west with out these west of Kentucky wouldnt have came into the us till later most likely
What exactly is the question? Comment and tell me it.
Answer:
how the secondary data were collected.
Explanation:
Secondary data refers to the data that is collected by other persons beside the researcher who actually use it. (in this context, it would be the data that is collected by other person than Marvin).
Sometimes, the collection method could influence the data given by the samples and will shaken up the overall conclusions.
I'll give you an example.
In market research, companies often conducts research to find out consumers' preference toward a certain product. This preference could be given by the people through either public survey and private survey. Most people tend to give a more truthful answer if the data is collected through private survey since answering in public survey makes the people fear a chance that they will be judged by others.
