1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bearhunter [10]
3 years ago
13

In the himalaya mountains along the border of tibet and nepal, mount everest reaches a record height of 29,035 feet. how high is

mt. everest in miles? use the conversion equivalency of 1 mile = 5280 feet.
Mathematics
2 answers:
natali 33 [55]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Alright, lets get started.

The height of the mt. everest is : 29035 feet.

The unit conversion is given as :

5280 feet = 1 mile

1 feet = \frac{1}{5280} mile

So, 29035 feet = 29035*\frac{1}{5280} miles

29035 feet = \frac{29035}{5280} miles

29035 feet = 5.499 miles

So, the height of the mt. everest in miles is 5.499 miles.   :   Answer

Hope it will help :)

saul85 [17]3 years ago
5 0
29,028ft 5 and 1/2 miles About as big as 20 empire state buildings.
You might be interested in
Which description is true about ​ pre-image ABC ​ and ​ image A′B′C′ ​ ?
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

It's both, C and D -> first you move than you scale

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How<br> many<br> squares<br> are in this<br> figure?
Sophie [7]

Answer:

<h2>14</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

Look at the picture.

7 0
3 years ago
Explain how to model the problem with algebra tiles and
gregori [183]

Answer:someone answer the question already

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many quarters can you get to make a five dollar bill
Airida [17]
You would have 20 quarters to make 5 dollars
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rosa is trying to copy an angle. She reads and understands all of the steps, but insists on drawing circles instead of arcs. Whi
maksim [4K]

You have the correct answer. It is choice A. Nice work.

I prefer using full circles because sometimes the arcs could be too small in measure to not go where you want them to. If you're worried about things getting too cluttered (a legitimate concern), then I recommend drawing everything in pencil and only doing the circles as faint lines you can erase later. Once the construction is complete, you would go over the stuff you want to keep with a darker pencil, pen or marker. You can also use the circle as a way to trace over an arc if needed.

Choice B is false as a full circle can be constructed with a compass. Simply rotate the compass a full 360 degrees. Any arc is a fractional portion of a circle.

Choice C is false for similar reasoning as choice B, and what I mentioned in the paragraph above.

Choice D contradicts choice A, so we can rule it out. Arcs are easier to draw since it takes less time/energy to rotate only a portion of 360 degrees. Also, as mentioned earlier, having many full circles tend to clutter things up.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 4,876,213 rounded to the nearest ten thousand
    8·1 answer
  • What is the inverse of f(x) = 3x + 6 and is it a function?
    10·1 answer
  • The distance between points (X7, Yı) and (4, 8) is the square root of (x7 - 8)2 +
    8·1 answer
  • What is the derivative of y=2e^3x?
    13·1 answer
  • A researcher compared the heights and shoe sizes for 50 men, selected at random. The equation shown describes a line of best fit
    11·1 answer
  • HELP I NEED HELP WITH 3-5
    14·1 answer
  • I’m so confused what is answer to the value of x HELPPP
    13·2 answers
  • Is 122/48 in its simplest form or is it’s simplest form 61/24?
    14·2 answers
  • Evaluate (-9)+9 <br> please
    12·2 answers
  • What is the distance between the points (4, 5) and (4, -3)
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!