Answer: No se como hacer el cálculo
Explanation: Aún así creo que la opcion es la C
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
they are both nomadic
Explanation:
Dinka and Nuer connected to each other either through adoption, marriage, and cultural assimilation. Their identity depended on kinship affiliation as much as language. They share a significant amount of vocabulary.
Answer:
Concept: Application of psychology
- Happiness
- Ethics
- Pride
- Strength
- Honesty
There are democrats and republican parties from each state and the person running for president is trying to get for example the most democratic votes / republican votes depends what party they are running for
