Answer:
Amy and Lester are both weird so that's your answer.
Explanation:
none needed
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- Throughout the macroeconomic equilibrium, the aggregate supply curve becomes equivalent to something like the supply curve, the real GDP seems to be comparable to potential Output (GDP), however, if frictional as well as systemic unemployment seems to be the maximum total poverty throughout the longer term.
- Consequently, whenever the economy seems to be in macroeconomic equilibrium, the argument which is not accurate would be that the businesses would have excess power.
So that Option C is the right answer.
Answer:
the artist should make the elegant version since the expected profits are higher
Explanation:
elegant version:
expected revenue = (400 x $150 x 40%) + (350 x $110 x 60%) = $47,100
expected profits = $47,100 - $30,000 = <u>$17,100</u>
deluxe version:
expected revenue = (500 x $110 x 40%) + (450 x $70 x 60%) = $47,100
expected profits = $42,250 - $30,000 = $12,250
It would be on June 3rd. This is the day before the ex-dividend date. The ex-dividend date for stocks is typically set one working day before the record date. If you acquire a stock on its ex-dividend date or after, you will not obtain the next dividend imbursement. As an alternative, the vendor gets the dividend. If you buy earlier than the ex-dividend date, you can get the dividend.
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
