No, because if you divide 23 / 4, you get 5.75. You can't get 0.75th of a kid. So it is not reasonable, because it is a decimal, and not a whole number.
Hope this helped! ☺♥
These are complementary angles, meaning they add up to 180
Let's write an equation
180=38 + 42 + (2x+10)
subtract 38 from both sides
142 = 42 + 2x + 10
subtract 42 from both sides
100 = 2x + 10
subtract 10 from both sides
90 = 2x
divide both sides by 2
45 = x
Plug that back into the angle
2x+10
2(45)+ 10
90 + 10
100
The angle is 100 degrees.
To check:
180 =?= 38 + 42 + (2x+10)
180 =?= 38 + 42 + (2(45) + 10)
180 =?= 80 + (90 + 10)
180 =?= 80 + 100
180 = 180
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
you put the -9 above where it says the -9 and same to the -3
or to solve the equation:
Divide both sides of the equation by the same term
−9=−3−9−3=−3−3
Divide the numbers
−9−3=−3−3
3=−3−3
Cancel terms that are in both the numerator and denominator
Move the variable to the left =3x=3
Solution =3
Answer:
simple quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides. The opposite or facing sides of a parallelogram are of equal length and the opposite angles of a parallelogram are of equal measure
Step-by-step explanation:
Do you mean m*1? using that as the less then sign makes no sense here. Assuming m*1 = 100, then m=100, so 4m = 100*4 = 400
