The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the US Constitution states that the US may not make any laws "respecting an establishment of religion."
In essence, the US cannot pick a religion and make laws to such an effect.
The US does NOT have a national religion and was not founded as a Christian nation.
In England, the king appointed judges and could remove them at will, so judges had strong incentives to issue rulings that pleased the king to keep their jobs.
The Framers of the Constitution instead wanted an independent judiciary able to act as a buffer against an oppressive legislature or executive. As Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist 78, the Framers granted federal judges life tenure to protect them from undue political influence: “In a monarchy it is an excellent barrier to the despotism of the prince; in a republic it is a no less excellent barrier to the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body.”
Life tenure is intended to allow judges to issue rulings that go against the majority or ruling elite without fear of retribution. And these protections are necessary: Federal judges routinely rule on the most important and controversial issues of the day and consider whether state and federal laws are constitutional, raising claims of “countermajoritarian” behavior by scholars and politicians alike.
Public criticism of judicial decisions is also nothing new: Newly inaugurated President Thomas Jefferson vehemently derided the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, perhaps the most consequential Supreme Court decision, which ultimately established the power of judicial review, or the ability of courts to strike down laws as unconstitutional. Jefferson even tried to block the court from ruling on the case by canceling the court’s June 1802 term.
President Barack Obama famously criticized the justices of the Supreme Court for their ruling in Citizens United v. FEC while they sat silently at the 2010 State of the Union.
<em>Hope it helps </em>
.... Pls mark brainliest
The Code of Hammurabi (dated from 1754 BC), by King Hammurabi himself, established laws that helped structure and regulate social order in Mesopotamia. In this way, he was the creator of the first written laws.
The imaginary trial gives us an insight of the participants of the process (judge, witnesses, the accuser and defendant) and the different steps that take place during the process. After the accusation, the judge consults the Code of Hammurabi, and determines what penalty will be given to the Shepherd. So, by describing the imaginary trial of the Shepherd who stole the nobleman's sheep, the author shows how the Code of Hammurabi might apply to a specific situation.
The appropriate response is A. The expanded part of soft money in crusade financing, by precluding national political gathering advisory groups from raising or spending any assets not subject as far as possible, notwithstanding for state and nearby races or issue discourse.
The expansion of issue backing advertisements, by characterizing as "electioneering interchanges" communicate promotions that name a government competitor inside 30 days of an essential or gathering or 60 days of a general race, and precluding any such advertisement paid for by a partnership or paid for by a unincorporated substance utilizing any corporate or union general treasury stores.
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
The article talks about the places and the newspaper - Brainiest?
