Answer:
subsistence farming.
Explanation:
Subsistence farming -
It refers to the type of farming , where all the livestock and crops produced are used for the purpose of charity or for the use of framer , is referred to as subsistence farming .
These type of farming helps majorly the farmer to fulfil his basic needs and requirements , so as to live a happy and healthy life .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is subsistence farming .
Answer:
The answer is written communication.
Explanation:
Written communication can be both formal and informal; in this case, the tone is clearly formal.
One important feature of written communication is that it's usually taken as the final word, which means it can't be taken back es easily; however, the rise of instant messaging has led to a more natural and intimate use of written communication. That's why professional and academic related messages are typically sent via e-mail.
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
Answer:
Peer testimony
Explanation:
A testimony is simply called a given statement by a person who possesses a reasonable or logical connection to the subject, field or topic and He or she must be a credible source. Mostly, it can be used to either clarify or prove a point.
Peer testimony can simply be defined as when a statement or testimony is being given by an individual who does not have expertise in the that particular area, field or subject that is in question. they can also be called antiauthorities because it's testimony source that is neither expert nor celebrity, but likely to the subject of an audience. Paul may not be an expert in that field but he has personal experience with the issue in question.
