<span>prenuptial and trust </span>
<span>·
</span>separates pre-marital
and marital property
<span>·
</span>protects one spouse
from the other's debts
<span>·
</span>provides for children
from previous relationships
<span>·
</span>keeps family property
in the family
<span>·
</span>protects individual
estate plans
<span>·
</span>details property and
asset distribution in the event of a divorce
<span>marriage responsibilities</span><span>Prenuptial
</span>
<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
<span>American Romanticism was the first
full-fledged literary movement that developed in the U.S. It was made up
of a group of authors who wrote and published between about 1820 and
1860, when the U.S. was still finding its feet as a new nation.</span>
The freeing of serfs in Russia was an expression of liberalism because it advocated individuals having personal freedom. As Alexander said to the nobles, "The existing condition of owning souls cannot remain unchanged."
However, what was done in freeing the serfs expressed conservatism because the arrangement ultimately favored the nobles, leaving half of the lands in their hands and requiring payment from the serfs to the nobles for any lands transferred to them.
Note: The Civil War in the USA began in the same year that the emancipation of serfs was proclaimed in Russia. Technically, serfdom in Russia was not the same as slavery in the United States. Landowners did not own the serfs as property, but because they were bound to the land as workers for the landowner who owned the land, their resulting situation was similar. And because they were given legal freedom but had to pay for any land they would acquire from the nobles, the cost of their freedom was high.
Answer:
Saddam Hussein was less confident about going into another war with the US. Despite his non hostile treatment of Al Qaeda forces in his country Iraq which were responsible for various terrorists attack in US, the US government decided to punish him for such deeds.
He however knew immediately that he couldn’t defeat the US due to his weak army forces, resources and other countries being in support of the US
