1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
9

Which plans most favored the larger states, as they would be represented more heavily in the national government? (Select all th

at apply.) Virginia Plan Connecticut Compromise Hamilton’s Plan Pinckney Plan New Jersey Plan
History
2 answers:
Bess [88]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Connecticut Compromise</span>
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Pinckney Plan

Virginia Plan

These were correct for me, I hope this helps

You might be interested in
Match the events and their causes. 1. English Civil War 2. Glorious Revolution.a. Parliament feared the risk of a Catholic dynas
amm1812

Answer:

English Civil War - The king ruled without parliament

Glorious revolution - Parliament feared the risk of a Catholic dynasty ruling England

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How and why did Europe involve itself in Iran?
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

Iran was considered a threat to the US. So our government helped arm the country of Iraq during very tense anti American movement was formed within iran

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best completes the timeline? Early civilizations develop in ancient Egypt Carthage builds a northem African empi
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:D

Explanation:

I did the quiz if wrong sorry

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For a large part of the 20th century, only a small part of the population in South Africa had a say in the government. Certain r
Stella [2.4K]
Yes, oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid.  In the political philosophy of Aristotle, "aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors.  In Aristotle's political thought, an "oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy.  But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.)   Today, we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.

For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
8 0
3 years ago
Andrew Jackson Writing Piece
klio [65]
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.

When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In contrast to white settlers, Native Americans viewed nature as
    10·2 answers
  • As the American population grew between 1820 and 1850, the percentage of Americans living on farms also grew.
    7·1 answer
  • Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!3. Read the quote below, and then answer the question that follows.
    6·2 answers
  • Whitch of the following is a cultural of the ancient
    7·1 answer
  • Which supreme court case ruled that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment did not require jury trials in juvenile c
    11·1 answer
  • What did Congress charter in 1816?
    7·1 answer
  • What impact would the printing press have on religious reform movements of the 1500s?
    15·1 answer
  • The American cowboy owes much of its model to what other culture?Mexicans
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me with this one question? Please it would be really appreciated.
    5·2 answers
  • How were the vastly outnumbered British forces able to defeat the French at Agincourt?The British military had more advanced wea
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!