Answer:
B The ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication.
Explanation:
The court will base its decision on its determination that the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. While the First Amendment protects the freedoms of speech and assembly, the government may reasonably regulate speech-related conduct in public forums through content‑neutral time, place, and manner regulation. Here, the ban on camping overnight in the park, a content-neutral regulation of a public forum, would be evaluated by the court based on if the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. In this scenario, the question would be if the ban on the use of the park will limit alternative channels of communicating the message of the scout leader and if yes the ban may be lifted and if not, it will not be lifted.
A cause i just took the test
<span>Adolph Quetelet believed there was a direct correlation between social factors and property and violent crime. Included among those factors are the age of the perpetrator as well as their gender, their environment, poverty level, level of education and their use of alcohol.
Many of his contemporaries disagreed with his belief because they felt the idea of social factors removed the idea of freedom of choice.</span>
The appointment of executive agency heads, such as cabinet level secretaries, commissioners, directors and assistants, allows the Governor to set the direction of the administration. for example: secretary of finance, infrastructure, education, and others.
Http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/cnat/hd_cnat.htm
hope this helps
