Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The fraction that should be removed is 1/5.
<h3>How to calculate the fraction?</h3>
It should be noted that from the information, 40% of the coins are 20-cent coins and the rest are 50-cent coins. Those that are 50 cent will be:
= 100 - 40%
= 60%
The fraction that's should be removed will be:
= 2/5 - x = 1/5
x = 2/5 - 1/5
x = 1/5
The fraction that should be removed is 1/5.
Learn more about fractions on:
brainly.com/question/17220365
#SPJ1
It would be a direct variation.
