Answer:
I assume this postulates a state statute. A decision upholding the constitutionality of a federal statute might or might not bode well for an equivalent state statute. Some federal laws are within the exclusive province of the federal government, so states may not legislate about the same subject under any circumstances, such as most matters of foreign relations and national defense. There are also categories of law that Congress may choose to make exclusively federal. The Copyright Act of 1976 did that for copyright law, which previously allowed scope for complementary state law.
Explanation:
Answer:
its true :))
hope u have a great day!!
Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
The answer would be #3
Due to lack of trees to use for building a cabin, many of the prairie homes were made of sod.
