Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

9

the intersection of roads m and n creates a 41.4 angle. what are the complementary and supplementary angles of this intersection

?

1 answer:

MaRussiya [10]2 years ago

7 0

The complementary angle of this intersection is 48.6
The supplementary angle of this intersection is 138.6

You might be interested in

Use the elimination method to solve the system of equations. Choose the correct ordered pair. 4x + 8y = 16 4x - 8y = 0 A. (4, 2)

balu736 [363]

Adding both equations cancels y:

<span>4x + 8y = 16
</span><span>4x - 8y = 0
-----------------+
8x = 16 => x=2

filling in x=2 in the first equation gives:

4*2 + 8y = 16 => 8y = 8 => y=1

So (2,1) is the (x,y) pair that solves the two equations. Answer C.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

What is the slope of the line passing through<br> points (6, -1) and (1,8)?

Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

-1.8

Step-by-step explanation:

m= y2 - y2over x2 - x1

m= -1 - 8 over 1 - 6 = -1.8

m= -1.8

7 0

2 years ago

(3x+4)^2=14 what are the solutions?

kherson [118]

$\bf (3x+4)^2=14\implies \sqrt{(3x+4)^2}=\pm\sqrt{14}\implies 3x+4=\pm\sqrt{14}
\\\\\\
3x=\pm \sqrt{14}-4\implies x=\cfrac{\pm \sqrt{14}-4}{3}\implies x=
\begin{cases}
\cfrac{\sqrt{14}-4}{3}\\\\
\cfrac{- \sqrt{14}-4}{3}
\end{cases}$

7 0

3 years ago

Sam runs 2 miles in 16 minutes. If Sam runs at the same rate, how far can he run in 64 minutes?

Pie

Answer:

8 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Since

16 x 4 = 64

Therefore

2 x 4 = 8

8 miles

5 0

3 years ago

The USDA conducted tests for salmonella in produce grown in California. In an independent sample of 252 cultures obtained from w

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 252$

The number that tested positive is $k_1 = 18$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 476$

The number that tested positive is $k_2 = 20$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

Generally the first sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _1 = \frac{k_1 }{ n_1 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = \frac{18 }{ 252 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = 0.071$

Generally the second sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _2 = \frac{k_2 }{ n_2 }$

=> $\^ p _2 = \frac{20 }{ 476}$

=> $\^ p _2 = 0.042$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 - p_2 = 0$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 - p_2 \ne 0$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented

$z = \frac{ \^ p_1 - \^ p_2 - ( p_ 1 - p_2 )}{ \sqrt{\frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^ p_1)}{ n_1 } + \frac{\^ p_2 (1-\^ p_2)}{ n_2 } } }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.071 - 0.042 - 0 }{ \sqrt{\frac{0.071 (1-0.071)}{ 252 } + \frac{0.042 (1-\^ 0.042)}{ 476 } } }$

=> $z = 1.56$

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.56 is

$P(Z > 1.56 ) =0.05938$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 1.56 )$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.05938$

=> $p-value = 0.1188$

From the value obtained we see that $p-value > \alpha$ hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

5 0

2 years ago