Answer:
Business diversion
Explanation:
The above scenario is an example of business diversion type of scheme whereby Johanna diverted her employer new client in order to generate her personal income, and it happens without the knowledge of her boss
Answer:
B. Official note of sale.
Explanation:
An official note of sale is a disclosure document for new issue municipal bonds. These bonds, when sold by the issuer, must ensure that an officail not of sale is distributed to all purchasers before or at the settlement. The notice of sale is distributed by underwriters.
Cheers.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. greater perceived value.
Explanation:
Considering Nora's previous experience, it can be determined that her purchase decision is not oriented to the brand, but to the perception of value over other variables. In this scenario, it is most likely that Nora chooses to decide on the second option, since surely having no preferences she wants to experience the experience of enjoying new sneakers with different variables than the one she initially acquired.
Answer:
A. $22.61
Explanation:
First,
find the growth rate(g);
g = ROE *retention rate
retention rate = 35%
ROE = Net income/value of equity
ROE = 800,000/5,000,000 = 0.16
Therefore, g = 0.16*0.35
g =0.056 or 5.6%
Price = ![\frac{D0(1+g)}{(r-g)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BD0%281%2Bg%29%7D%7B%28r-g%29%7D)
D0 = Recently paid dividend
g = growth rate
r = required return
Price = ![\frac{1.37(1.056)}{0.12-0.056} \\ \\ =\frac{1.44672}{0.064} \\ \\ =22.605](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1.37%281.056%29%7D%7B0.12-0.056%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%3D%5Cfrac%7B1.44672%7D%7B0.064%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%3D22.605)
Therefore, the value of this stock is $22.61
Answer:
No. She suffered no physical impact
Explanation:
Negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs when a person engages in an act that can cause severe emotional distress to another .
The plaintiff must be able to prove that the act was done willfully or provide an evidence that
- It was a result of defendant's negligence
- Plaintiff suffered emotional distress a direct result of the action
- The action was foreseeable by the defendant
- The plaintiff was in a danger zone
before he can win a claim.
The question here is how to prove emotional stress? The plaintiff must be able to show a verifiable physical injury that is linked to the emotional distressed suffered.