Step-by-step explanation:
(a + b)² = 9
(b + c)² = 25
(a + c)² = 81
Taking the square root:
a + b = ±3
b + c = ±5
a + c = ±9
By adding these three equations together and dividing both sides by 2, we get the value of a + b + c.
Possible combinations for a + b + c such that the sum is greater than or equal to 1 are:
a + b + c = (-3 + 5 + 9)/2 = 11/2
a + b + c = (3 − 5 + 9)/2 = 7/2
a + b + c = (3 + 5 + 9)/2 = 17/2
<u>Answer:</u>
The value of x is in the solution set of 3(x – 4) ≥ 5x + 2 is -10
<u>Solution:</u>
Need to determine which value of x from given option is solution set of 3(x – 4) ≥ 5x + 2
Lets first solve 3(x – 4) ≥ 5x + 2
3(x – 4) ≥ 5x + 2
=> 3x – 12 ≥ 5x + 2
=> 3x – 5x ≥ 12 + 2
=> -2x ≥ 14
=> -x ≥ 7
=> x ≤ -7
All the values of x which are less than or equal to -7 is solution set of 3(x – 4) ≥ 5x + 2. From given option there is only one value that is -10 which is less than -7
Hence from given option -10 is solution set of 3(x – 4) ≥ 5x + 2.
Answer:
8 pencils
Step-by-step explanation:
We can reverse everything that is happening in the problem like this!...
Jeremiah has 20 - 4 pencils = 16 than 2 reverse operation of multiplication which will be division then 16 ÷ 2 = 8
Check work? 8 more than 2 times equals 16 + 4 more that Jeremiah has equals 20 pencils
Multiply 4.93m by 8.5m to get 41.905m to the second power.
You do this because there are 2 identical triangles on the top. And if you put those two triangles together, you get a rectangle. The length of the rectangle is 8.5m while the width would be 4.93. Multiplying the length and width gives you the area.
Then multiply 10.2m by 8.5m to get 86.7m to the second power.
You do this because there are 2 identical triangles on the bottom. And if you put those two triangles together, you get another rectangle. The length of the rectangle is 8.5m while the width would be 10.2m. Multiplying those together gives you the area.
You then add the two areas, 41.905m to the second power and 86.7m to the second power, to get the area of the entire figure.
After adding, you get 128.605 m to the second power. That's the answer
Answer:
Internal validity
Step-by-step explanation:
The internal validity here is weak
Internal validity describes the extent to which an evidence weighs the cause and effect claim. In this study, the internal validity that brought about failure in the new exam is mainly due to the environment where the exam was written and not the new exam itself.
So this validity is weak in claiming that the new exam is not a good substitute for the old exam.
Putting them in the same good environment might help the researchers to draw a better conclusion.
