Answer: no
Explanation: if the government didn't protect the peoples rights then the people can throw out the government and replace a new and better one to the peoples liking since its well known in the constitution that the people have the power to do so, like the magna carta where the government (king) at the time abused power and gave cruel and usual punishments. The government cannot go against the people or take there rights (John Locke - the social contract) its also why we have our bill of rights to secure our rights for the government does not violate us and rule of law where nobody is above the law. The government would only go to great lengths if it was a issue the people suggest they look into, other then that the government does not go to far lengths for there citizens unless they get called out for it.
Pros
Political parties encourage public participation.
Political parties create checks and balances.
Political parties distribute information throughout society.
Political parties water down special interest investments.
Cons
Political parties can be abusive.
Political parties encourage polarization.
Political parties prioritize themselves.
Political parties sacrifice individuality.
The first congress did not yet have the desire for independence, they just wanted to go back to normal, meaning that the laws be repealed. Already the second congress wanted the total independence of England.
A precedent is a principle or
rule in court wherein a previous legal case is used to decide on subsequent
cases with similar issues or facts. This is called stare decisis, a principle
wherein judges use precedents for their decision.