When Jason filled out his application his statements had to be <u>representations </u>to be considered legal.
The correct option is d.
Representations are statements made by the contractual parties to one another that exempt them from any doubts regarding the transaction. A representation is "a presentation of reality, designed to encourage another to engage into a contract, either by words or by behaviour."
A declaration of past or current truth (explicit or implicit) made by one party to persuade the other party to enter into the agreement is referred to as a representation.
A claim of inadequate representation may be filed if Jason's lawyer really failed to uphold their responsibility to him by, for example, skipping court, neglecting to research relevant legal precedent, or failing to speak up for him.
The complete question is
When Jason filled out his application his statements had to be ______________ to be considered legal.
Select one:
a. Contributory
b. Guaranteed
c. Warranties
d. Representations
To learn more about legal, refer
brainly.com/question/14337809
#SPJ4
Answer:
The North side
Explanation:
Why, because they had more advanced tech.
Answer:
There are various differences in the different editions and the most common one is the content of the textbook.
Explanation:
Changes in content are upgraded with the new research in the area of the specific field. Secondly, additional features such as academic studies, expert perspectives, and future research areas are explored in the new edition. Moreover, questions about the analysis and sets of problems are frequently updated and so does the price and design of the new edition. It helps the students to get the latest knowledge of the specific subject.
Answer:
Glendale was not able to prove that the ordinance directly advanced the claim of interest in public safety.
Explanation:
Pagan v. Fruchey and Village of Glendale is a case in which Christopher Pagan wanted to sell his car and put a for sale sign on it and parked it on a city street. Because of this, he received a notice that his car was in violation of a city ordinance that didn't allow him to do this. He filed a suit claiming that the law was unconstitutional because it violated his First Amendment right. Pagan won because Glendale couldn't provide enough evidence that the ordinance had the goal of avoiding a potential harm. It was considered that the law didn't serve a government interest in public safety.
