Intrinsic value of a stock is its true value. This is calculated on the basis of the monetary benefit you expect to receive from it in the future. Let us put it this way – it is the maximum value at which you can buy the asset, without making a loss in the future when you sell it.
<h3>What is good intrinsic value of stock?</h3>
Intrinsic value refers to some fundamental, objective value contained in an object, asset, or financial contract. If the market price is below that value it may be a good buy—if above a good sale.
When evaluating stocks, there are several methods for arriving at a fair assessment of a share's intrinsic value.
<h3>How do you find the intrinsic value of a stock?</h3>
Estimate all of a company's future cash flows. Calculate the present value of each of these future cash flows. Sum up the present values to obtain the intrinsic value of the stock.
Learn more about intrinsic value here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/14604717</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer:
Coercive power
Explanation:
Coercive power can be referred to as the use of force or exertion to ensure an employee fulfill the demands of an order or instruction. The employer exercise authority over the employee and has the ability to punish an employee if he or she doesn't comply. Most times employee obeys orders out of fear of not complying, in this case loosing their annual bonus.
Answer:
<em><u>Naturalistic Observation</u></em> and <em><u>Survey</u></em>
Explanation:
A study on consumer behavior is intended to provide data on the real behavior of customers.
Naturalistic observation <em>is a strategy of studies that psychologists and other social scientists frequently use.</em> This approach focuses on the observation of an individual or subject in their natural environment.
A survey is described as a technique of study <em>used to gather data from a predetermined group of participants in order to obtain information and perspectives on different subjects of concern.</em>
Answer:
Two of the main issues with the articles of confederation were economic disorganization and lack of central leadership.
Explanation:
Because the articles of confederation set the US government up as a confederacy where the individual states retained a lot of their individual sovereignty, it was hard in the first few decades for there to be a consolidated economic system and a strong sense of central leadership. Each state in the Northeast especially worked towards their own aims instead of coordinating trade. For example, Connecticut opened its ports to England, but Massachusetts did not according to founding father James Madison. There was no common currency either, and the central government could only negotiate trade conditions with the Native American populations.