The stage of the kill chain framework that an intruder extract or destroy data is: <u>The extraction stage.</u>
<h3>What is extraction stage?</h3>
The extraction stage can be defined as the stage where an unauthorized person gain access to a sensitive or confidential information and then destroy the data or information after extracting it.
On the other hand an intruder can be defined as a unauthorized person who gain access to store data.
Therefore The stage of the kill chain framework that an intruder extract or destroy data is: <u>The extraction stage.</u>
Learn more about extraction stage here:brainly.com/question/20491126
#SPJ1
Answer:
Positive psychology.
Explanation:
As the exercise briefly states, the positive psychology movement views psychological disorders as difficulties that inhibit the individual's ability to achieve highly subjective well-being and feelings of fulfilment. This discipline studies the "good life", what makes life attractive to live, working against negative thinking emphasising the well being, what life has still to give.
A correlation is some sort of connection between two or more ideas. The correlation between attendance and grades is that if a student has low attendance they would have lower grades than that of a student who had high attendance.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
