I believe so but not really sure
The result of the isolation of the Australian continent for millions of years was because the continent has no fossil record of species evolution.
The supercontinent Pangaea was believed to exist in early times and incorporated all the landmasses on Earth
- The theory of continental drift explains that plate whichs forms the lithosphere of continent continue to move and has been in process for million of years ago
- The theory of continental drift does applies to Australia continent as well because it is believed the continent moves away and isolates from the supercontinent Pangaea
Hence, the Option A is correct because the result of the isolation of the Australian continent for millions of years was because the continent has no fossil record of species evolution.
Read more about continental drift
brainly.com/question/15283911
There are a lot of contributions of Rene Descartes. René Descartes conclusive argument was that the nature of the mind which is thinking and non-extended thing is said to be very different from that of the body.
<h3 /><h3> What was Descartes view on the mind-body problem?
</h3>
- A key and efficient lasting legacies of Descartes' philosophy is his work was that mind and body are really different. His thesis called “mind-body dualism.”
He was known to be the man who invented analytical geometry and brought about skepticism as a key part of the scientific method.
His conclusive argument was that the nature of the mind which is thinking and non-extended thing is said to be very different from that of the body and that their function is not the same.
Learn more about Rene Descartes from
brainly.com/question/838565
The answer is true. As stated by Hagan, “As mothers gain power comparative to husbands, daughters gain liberty relative to sons.” Over the egalitarian family structure, daughters are understood as more equal and can go in the workforce. Since not as much of control is applied on the daughter in the egalitarian family, they are given more possibility to take part in delinquent behavior, just as the sons are in patriarchal families. But, boys are still more probable to get involve in dangerous behavior. And the opposite of this goes to the patriarchal structure.
