Correction:
Because F is not present in the statement, instead of working onP(E)P(F) = P(E∩F), I worked on
P(E∩E') = P(E)P(E').
Answer:
The case is not always true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the odds for E equals the odds against E', then it is correct to say that the E and E' do not intersect.
And for any two mutually exclusive events, E and E',
P(E∩E') = 0
Suppose P(E) is not equal to zero, and P(E') is not equal to zero, then
P(E)P(E') cannot be equal to zero.
So
P(E)P(E') ≠ 0
This makes P(E∩E') different from P(E)P(E')
Therefore,
P(E∩E') ≠ P(E)P(E') in this case.
Looking at how the image shrinked from the original, you can assume that the scale would be a fraction. Since they remained negative, then the fraction wouldn't contain a negative. Therefore the answer would be C.
Price after 9% increased 1800
Price before increase 1800-9%*1800
=1638
Answer:
0.8 lb rice/ 1qt water is a unit rate for the mix.
Using the unit rate, the cook should mix 10 pounds of rice with 12.5 quarts of water.
These two statements are true the rest are false.
Step-by-step explanation:
Figuring out which statements are true and which statements are false.
If you can please make my answer the brainliest that would be much appreciated. Thanks!
The middle one is proportional
